In socialism, one man is poor, desperate, and in a turmoil, basically, he's just your average joe. then he sees a richie rich guy walk down the street and he wants it, more than anything else, but that's just human and animal nature; jelousy. soon he gets more power. he convinces everyone he's a great leader, and soon he kills anyone who doesn't think he is.
In capitalism, one man is poor, desperate, and in turmoil, basically, he's just your average joe. then he sees a richie rich guy walk down the street and he wants it, more than anything else, but that's just human and animal nature; jelousy. soon he works a long life, gets rich, and his sons bankrupt his enemies corporation before itself being bankrupted while destroying the country in economic collapse.
Really, in all honesty, human nature kills all government and all ideologies with one swift blow.
Logic says that we die. Logic says we have nothing to go on after that.
Logic says that the big bang started life, and evolution, not some hand from another dimension.
Logic says that humans are but primitive animals, like any other, and that we simply crawled out of the primordial slime.
Order is illogical, because in order, the ones on the bottom what to be on top while the top wants to stay on top!
Logic says 'having faith' is stupid and false.
Logic has prevailed in ancient china, and japan, and they lead the world in innovations, and now the USA is once we embraced logic and self organization.
Evolution is real.
Now look at it this way; would you rather ask "God" for forgiveness, or just fix it yourself?
If we assign god as our meaning to life, then if there is no god then life is meaningless. if we realize that there isn't anything "after" death, we can work towards a good life. who knows, i mean existentialism seems more logical than some petty religion.
Logic has prevailed until the times of religion, and statehood... and all things "unconciously recognizeable to modern man."
It is time we return to logic, or else all you'll do is try and live life "to an extent that isn't overbearing," instead of living it the right way, the fullest way.
Right now, we are on top of the world. We have a great economy, a great government system, and food for all to eat. The problem is, social degeneracy will cause the collapse of all that made us strong.
Look at the Romans, the Greeks, the Europeans, the French, and now... The Americans. Yes us.
Rome was on top of the world, it owned the world. It had it all, but for some reason, it lost it all too. It had the world's best army, and lost it all to petty barbarians. [remind you of some other country/empire?] Well, lets look not at their military, but their culture. What was happening before they fell? [no offence, I am pretty tolerable, I am merely making comparisons] Gayness was welcome, sex was bought and sold, and the borders were insecure. This happened to the Greeks as well. And the Europeans, and the French, and now the Americans.
Did you notice that our economy started slipping during the 70's/80's, or that we were going to start falling? Probably not.
I do not harbor any bad feelings towards gay people, they have the right to be gay, it is just I do not want marriage to be for everything, man to woman, woman to woman, man to man, woman to man to man, woman to woman to woman, etc. It is a religious, special thing, and deserves no benefits tied to it, for it is the benefits that hinder true love.
In the 50's our economy was sky high for its day and age. Everything was cheap, everyone had jobs, and everyone was safe.
I am sorry I can't go more indepth, but my time is short as I must go now. Good day.
Healthcare is a great idea-letting people get into hospitals fast cheap and easy, however, there are problems, such as how it is the way it is, and the malpractice suits.
If we really want reform, we cannot expect corporations to do the good changes by government's hands. The government can encourage, but the one conclusive way is to allow corporations to know that if they do more, then they will probably face a socialist in power who would eliminate their power, which is true in these days. Another thing is medical co-ops, and paying more for more benefits. These would be astoundingly good, so long as states rights are maintained.
The issue of theology in politics is a highly inflated issue. Sometimes religion does influence decisions. Democrats and Republicans do it. We all do it. I always ask myself "what would Jesus do?" It helps me lead the happiest life I could ever live, and it keeps me going. I find that is not wrong. I believe by seperation of church and state, it means more for the state not to control the church, and vice verca, because the puritans were escaping the anglicans, and of course they didn't want the government owning the church or the church owning the government. I think it can be terrible for our nation to try and force atheism into government. I have no problem with atheism, but I do have a problem of forced religion or non-religion. If a president says "God bless America, and may he lead us to victory," then we should really not care about the fact he said the G word. Then there was that whole little girl going public school problem. Public school is the problem in reality. I went to a private school that cost 10,000 dollars a year to 15,000 dollars, and guess what? It was infinitely better than public schooling. It was paid for by the navy, and it was well worth it. So, if you really want a collegiate education for the public, why not get good stuff and good teachers and make parents pay more? That's right, the parents have no more money because of taxes, and will likely have less if that public option passes.
Then there's the problem of government. Right now Obama's admin are trying to get a bill allowing him to cancel internet service to providers he doesn't like. If that passes, there might not be a u4prez for much longer. hey, its all in the name of elitist equality. he is also asking us to flag one another.
I can go on and on, and I would just seem sillier for it, so instead, i'll just comment as I go.
Also-thank you all for supporting me, I am still one of the top indies! Thank you all so much!
I must wonder, the way things in our country are going, when will there be a time when there is a governmental repo agency for all children to be in, since all parents are inherently evil and that wanting the best for their kids is more evil than thinking affirmative action and illegal immigration are bad. I wonder when I will die, and be grinded down into a food so that way my body is reused and keeps the environment clean, while the food make from me goes to a hobo who doesnt' want a job, and to a minority who doesn't know how to be a doctor, yet is one. I wonder when there will be the day of the civil defence force, ie the replacement for the military, police, and reserves. I wonder when i'll be shot for protestin all this. I then wonder about how people will be forced to drink water with steralization materials in them, while chuggin down government food.
You may be saying: You are crazy and there are better things to attack the government with and all that is not possible, nor is it ever going to happen!
Now, here is my counter: A long time ago, men thought flying was impossible. A long time ago men thought socialism wasn't possible here. A long time ago men thought that freedom was worth fighting for, even with blood.
Now, you may be saying: That is all generalized and has no meaning with your prediction.
Now, I say: Eventually we will run out of resources, or we will become so socially immobilized by the government that all that would be possible, and practical.
Now you say: You have no facts to back it up!
Now, I say: I do, look at the nutjobs for his non-industrial czars. They sure don't seem really as sane as should be the norm. Then there's the fact that being green is good, especially with a democrat for president. Then there's the fact that protesting is hated unless it is against taxes, but once it is against obama, then it is just plain racist.
Now you say: I still don't believe you and that you are crazy so just shut up.
Now I say: I won't shut up, but I respect your opinion and I hope we can agree to disagree.
Now you go look up the czars and see the facts, or you can look into your supermarkets and see all the green products. You can go and look at liberal blogs/websites like the huffington post, or you can even look at CNN and see how lou dobbs nearly got fired for asking for obama's real birth certificate, so the controversy can end.
Many people think about hamas, rockets, and the gaza "invasion" when they think of Israel. Well, the more we look at it and judge it to be a terrible country, the more israelis lose their lives. In the six days war, almost every arabic state contributed arms and soldiers to the countries that surrounded, and declared war upon israel. Their goal wasn't to take land or to get rich through peace grants, rather their goal was to exterminate the israelis and force them into the water. Israel had only one ally that gave it arms, and money: The USA. Every israeli male 18 and older was conscripted to defend against the possible loss and genocide, and thankfully, and by god's grace, they won, and even took the golan heights and took over the sinai peninsula and even threatened the egyptians with a possible taking of the suez, destroying egypt's economy. The israelis gave back sinai and now the egyptians are no longer advocating the extermination of israelis. We need to look at the facts. The fact of the matter is, that israel did not invade gaza because they wanted to kill innocent palestinians, but because they wanted to kill hamas to prevent them from killing innocent israeli men, women and children. Children in israel are taught how to duck from bombs and every citizen must be able to identify an IED. How they retain their sanity in such situations while knowing that if any arab nation gets a nuke, then all of them will be dead within 20 years due to radiation. This means that they know that if they do not act aggressively sometimes then they would all be dead by now. I wonder how we would act if we knew our lives would be over unless we acted proactively... It is a wonder israel is a democracy, the ONLY one in the MIDDLE EAST. They are what keeps americans from being killed. Mossad is the best, the absolute best intelligence agency on the face of the earth, and without their vital aid, we all would be in grave danger. Imagine if a terrorist blew up the white house on july 4th. Now imagine the mossad hero that saved us from that great destruction. If we let israel die off and rot, we would end up being the ones to rot away and die. The stronger the ties with israel, the stronger they are and the stronger their democracy is. We need to cut out aid to them, but instead, give them true trades. They have a great technology and building sector, so they could trade with us, we give them resources, and they give us products for our markets that are of the finest grade imagineable, far outplacing china! Now, back to the six days war. Egypt & co. had about 550,000 troops, 950 combat aircraft, and 2,504 tanks. Israel had 260,000 troops, 300 combat aircraft, and 800 tanks. Israel ended up doing more damage, extremely more damage, than they got. Because we supported them, they ended up winning a victory that assured their victory for decades. That security is now threatened and every israeli, and freedom loving american now faces a great genocide for them, and us, if we do not keep up the relations with israel. Israel is also needing resources because the middle east holds 2/3 of all oil reserves, while israel has nothing. If we trade resources in exchange for products with them, then we can help them, us, and democracy/freedom.
Now there is so much more I can/might add later.
I ask you, would you rather our country be asking for middle eastern acceptance when they would rather kill us all, and kill every israeli? The more we get in bed with saudi arabia and china, and russia, is the more they give arms, money and resources to the enemies of not only american freedom, but israeli lives. China gives rockets to iran, who gives them to hamas who then uses it to blow up a hotel room with a vacationing israeli family with kids in their and a babysitter while their parents shop, thus making the parents lose their children, and more lives lost.
I support israel, their democracy, and will forever do so, but do you?
The catholic pope that had the sheer unluck of being pope during mr. luther's time surely had no contingency for such action as that of the action that mr. luther took. Mr luther was an insignificant, lowly, and a man utterly devoid of charisma. He was a man who had much personal inquiry that troubled him deeply. Little did the world know how little a man caused such great change, which is still unravelling today. He would not have been able to release such an atomic blast on history if it weren't for the time he were born in and how he was raised, lived, and loved.
The times in which he grew up in were a time of quick and somehow subtle changes. The middle class which was growing, quickly decided to be against the ruling power of the world: the church [catholic church]. In the Holy Roman Empire [1st Reich, ie, Germany {it also controlled north italy}], the powers that made it up were divided, and often tried to outdo each other. the emperor, and his subjects were quite worried.
The times in which he grew up in were very troubling for christianity. Christendom was under attack. The Jihad was almost ready to destroy europe and end christianity forever. Spain had been reconquered but faced many challenges. The middle east was far richer than europe, and had more technology. Islam was doing far better than europe for the times. Europe seemed doomed, as barbarians, northerners, and islam challenged the church [the main ruling power of europe]. The only thing holding the people together at the time was for the fact of mere survival.
The times of change were dawning near as mr. luther was being concieved, and the classes quietly were becoming more and more radicalized against authoritized church society that told them what to believe. The changes for christian freedom came with the translation of the bible, and the showing of the many flaws with it from the original hebrew version. The corruptions were there and they presented a case for the giving of money to the church, when in the original it did not.
Mr. Luther was raised in an extremly harsh world, by extremely harsh parents, at least by todays standards. Mr. Luther escaped his parents and joined a monestary and become holier. He studied and learned much, and did much. Finally he realized that the church was against what it should be for, and what god wanted it to be for. So he pondered about it and read scripture, and came up with 95 things that needed to change in the church.
Remember though, that right now christendom was on the verge of collapse. All hell was breaking loose and no one felt safe. The catholic church wanted to have a new, huge, church to show its power, but it had no money. The only way to pay for it was to get people to buy indulgences, or tickets out of purgatory.
The indulgence idea enraged mr. Luther.
Eventually, after he had enough, mr. Luther nailed up the 95 things that needed to change, and it drew quite a bit of attention. Eventually the pope learned of it, and felt the changes would end the construction of the new church, and he quickly drew upon mr. Luther to make him beg for mercy to be forgiven for his sins, or face excommunication and death by [what the pope thought] a large mob. Mr. Luther faced death in the eye, and stood strong. The people immiediately took notice, and gave mr. Luther such great support, that he did not die. The pope was infuriated. The middle class was happy, the peasants angry and wanting more change. The ruling elite not quite sure what to do. Islam, waiting to see how it ends, and if they can take advantage of the situation. Christianity was tearing itself apart, is what the muslims saw, but for mr. Luther, it was christianity reforming itself, and he knew, either the church bends, or it will break. Unfortunately they were stuck in their ways, and wanted more.
Mr. Luther wrote a great number of writings, many of which are forgotten today, save for the knowledge of the fact that the pope once again called on mr. Luther, as the writings were causing quite a ruccous. Mr. Luther again faced death in the eye, and stood strong. Mr. Luther faced the establishment and did not falter in his wishing of reform. The people supported mr. Luther one hundred and one percent, and he did not die. The church was slowly, and painfully losing power. The people could trust luther, he was uncorruptable, he had his problems like them, and he cared for the poorer of the world, the middle class, but despised how the rich can be corrupt, yet loved how some are so nice to the poorer and to the middle. Mr. Luther wanted the catholic church to see its error, change, and make the world safe again. The people wanted to decide for themselves what way religion should be. The middle classes wanted to be able to believe in god, and not have to pay the church everytime they wanted to be forgiven for their sins. The rich wanted an end to the fuss, so they could continue business as usual. The rich were divded and often fought one another.
It wasn't just about the survival of this one man, this one idea, and the one religion it came to change, and in the end, change the world forever. Mr. Luther will be remembered for all history and till time comes to end. Until such time, mr. luther's dreams may not come true until many generations later. The Rich, as I mentioned, were divided in this struggle. The rich controlled many and could wage war, but the pope would not allow it. The only person and the only country holding christendom together, and keeping it from death, was Mr. Luther of the 1st Reich [Germany].
Mr. Luther did not expect the violence would escelate, and when it did, he could not get it to stop until much later. However, the rich would be divided for quite a long time, and still are. The middle class too, were divided into left and right, the left for luther and more freedom, the right, for more church. Eventually, they parted their ways, and would never forgive the other side. Christianity was divided and drew up war against each other, not declaring it, but wishing it. The violence didn't stop, and soon the armies of the lands were so strong, that islam was forced to end its campaigns against christendom, because the division made them stronger. Christianity never took any political side after that, save for the modern day. Christianity was reinforced after that, not making any one particular church the one dominant one, but making the religion the one dominant one.
Christianity then took to the new lands of the west. The new world beckoned, and the europeans answered. The first reich died silently and without too much fuss. The land of mr. Luther was forgotten... and dead. Mr. Luther's ideas continued on, and the ideas behind them were felt very soon after a great country was born of fire, blood, and metal. The country of America went against what was thought and expected of a country of that time. Other countries wanted empires, money, and power. America wanted to prosper, wanted religion to be a part of society, while never letting it influence politics, and wanted to make sure everyone has the same rights and could advance in society, or go down. Mr. Luther had a new nation. Even though he is far dead by then, hundreds of years old, his ideas still live on to this day, in this country, although it is being marginalized.
While America prospered, we forced empires to die, just because we wanted to be strong, smart, and independant of the world.
World war two changed everything for us. The first world war and the great depression changed the times though, so that little thing called peacetime, was born in an era of much confusion and much conformity.
This great era was called the 50's. Mr. Luther has no nation today, and is quietly waiting for a new nation. He is over a thousand years of age, and might never find a stable, true, nation, save our own, if we change. Now, back to what i was saying. The soldiers, sailors, and airmen that came back were changed. They loved their country and believed that we were always just. We were a nation of conformity. There was mother in the kitchen baking dinner, while littly johnny was sitting in the room watching television. There was father on the couch reading his paper and complaining about the world. It turned out little johnny didn't quite like being drafted, like his father had. He believed in many things, many of which I may not agree with, but his ideas of freedom and giving all rights, and being non-conformist are still true to this day. He was a radical, albeit for all the wrong reasons. Then little johnny had kids, and those kids were rather odd, he was quite confused. He grew up as a man with drugs in his blood and beer in his breath. Littly gregory grew up scared and frightened. He grew up to be a great man in society, the everyman. A middle classer whose sole goal was to live and die a happy, healthy, and succesfull man. He was open to all ideas, and neither liked nor disliked authority. He was a 80's man. There were many like him. He was a yuppie, as the term was. He would become a greedy investor, or a CEO. Then time passed on and little gregory had little alex, and alex grew up in the 90's. He grew up to be a great leader in a time of need, for his community as a major in the army and would later fight in the iraq war. He would leave behind a son that would not know his father, as he died from an IED. Now, how does mr. Luther have anything to do with mr. Alex?
Well, look at the religions. Christianity was/is in decay in America and its ideals are under attack. All things christian are being slowly and quietly destroyed, and despised by the radicalized left. The tables have turned, and the right stands as the vanguard of change, against an overly totalitarian left. Mr. Luther was a German. He respected authority, and understood its need in society. He was also a German and wanted to be able to do as he pleases as long as it didn't hurt anyone. He was also a German and thought that religion could/would bring about change and should bring about change, to show religion isn't as bad as people thought.
Now, while christianity and any christian-like religion dies in America, while tolerance of radicalized islam is up, christianity is on the rise in Asia, and Afrika.
While the great religion decays in my own homeland, I must wonder, as do you all, where will leftism end?
It won't end. It is acting as an oppressor, much like the catholic church of its day, instead, acting as a political entity whose sole goal is the complete illegalization of all things related to conserving ethics/morals, such as decency, and such as the idea of life being born in the first cell of a baby girl or boy. Now, the leftist arguement is that equality above all else. Well, is that so true, with mr. Obama and his regime being able to have the best healthcare in the world while advoacating giving everyone else very bad coverage. This is not the change that will do good. Rather, this quest for equality by any means necissary will end only with us losing our moral, ethical, and our immortal soul, as the day will come, when we will be asked to have some devide implanted into our left hand, to keep track of us. In fact, the saudis have made a chip that has cyanide in it, so if you dissent, you die. Now, you may be asking: this is absurd and will never happen!
Maybe you are right. But what if you aren't? Will you like to know your kids are part of the Anti-christ's regime, as defined in the last book. After all, the day when we lose our right hand is the day we lose to the antichrist, at least as immortal souls. If you dissent, you'd die, as was the fate of true christians at the end of the book. I'm not saying mr. Obama is the antichrist, but if he does such action as that as warranted in the last books, then, I am afraid to say it, but he would be, and it would be every christian, muslim, and jew's goal to topple him. Now, he may never be, nor would any president be that, but there is a possibility. The world is changing, and time will end. Maybe it won't be our generation, but millions of generations later. Who honestly knows. Maybe all those "nuts" will be right in the assumption of tribulation in 2012... But what I do say, is we all need to put up 95 thesis' of our own, showing we will not stand for the destruction of all things holy, good, and moral.
The left needs to cower in fear of the people, and the people's voice. The educated masses of America need to know their children will not fail in life, because they feel superior to one another due to them thinking they have the best of everything, even though they are quickly becoming morally bankrupt. So, I ask all of you, to put up all things you think is wrong with America, America's children, America's old, America's problems in general. Put up anything at all that you feel is wrong/amoral/unethical about america or any of the representatives of her. Left, or right, put them up. I will do all I can, to pick out the best ones, making sure they are not too radical, or too moderate, and making sure to be fair and unbiased as possible, and I will send it in to major news networks. It will be harder, stronger, and faster news than mr. Luther's reformist thesis. It will be an American/true thesis. Even socialists, one of whom I know, agree that today's left is not what america needs. However, he and I do disagree on economic issues, but we both agree on morals/ethics and democracy.
Mr. Luther is looking upon us, to either live, or to die. Either we will live and survive as the greatest generation to ever be, or we will die as slaves to an evil regime, that may or may not be so.
I do not make this arguement to be against mr. Obama personally, but rather the left in general, as it is today, as the fascistic/totalitarian ideology of extreme hatred and burning passions that can kill many.
So, post up anything you find wrong with America and think we need to reform. Be specific, or be general, just post them up. Be respectfull though, lest I have to cut out your comment.
I am not a radical, unless others make me out to be. I am not saying the left is the antichrist or that they are antichristian, or that they are all for oppression, but rather that those who represent and hold power over them want equality at any cost, even if it means the blood of our own, and others. I am simply saying, there is many things wrong with America and we will fail unless we reform. Bend, or break. Just like the church, we have a choice, bend, and change, and become better, stronger, and the best, or break, forever dividing us, and causing the greatest loss of blood imagineable, while never being able to be one again. So, post up your ideas of what is wrong with America, and I will nail it up in "wittenberg," and see how the authority of our time deals with it.
As republicans became the replacement for the whig party which was later ended, they inherited a great role. They no longer faced a Democrat-republican party, but an ideological enemy, not necissarily another party of similiar views, only dissenting on certain issues. No longer was this new, powerful, yet still growing party facing other third parties as it once had. It now wielded great power, and it could help influence the future of all mankind.
The republican party was a party rooted in being the small guy, the person who has no voice because he dissented from both large parties [the democrat-republicans and the whigs]. He was the guy that wanted more economic and more social freedom than he had at the time. He wanted to keep family values and wanted to be represented in this new american republic, already diveded as it was. In modern terms, the Republicans were the third party of their day, that would rise to fame after a grand president we all know and love. The Libertarians could almost be considered heralds of a new republican party. They too have a devout public advocating for them, and they are rather large in comparison to the other third parties.
I can only hope the republican party I know, love, and believe in still can continue this tradition of honour, respect, and representation. The democrats are probably the longest running party in this country. The republicans are slowly becomeing much like their oppenents, at least in government. Nowadays, if you dissent, you are shouted out and disliked. By both sides mutual hate, this occurs. This hate, which was so finalized by the civil war is again taking its toll on the American republic. The Libertarians are quickly becoming the heralds of the right wing, while the constitutionalists are more of the center party, albeit with a religious side. Are they to be the heralds of a two party system? I hope not, as I dearly love my party's ideals and all it stands[stood] for.
I remember the republican party my ancestors knew. The party of freedom, conservatism in social respects, liberal in economic aspects. This party means to me, what freedom and justice means to new immigrants from communist countries. The Republican party I remember honored its first instances of power and glory, ie, abraham lincoln, and they wanted to continue his tradition of being good heralds of the people's vote. I remember that they also believed in congress and senate. I remember that they were fighters, but in a way that dumbounded their opponents. They were rebels against the main parties, but they made themselves respectable. they had to, lest they be forgotten to all history. But recently, and in more decades after their demise, the new republicans are quickly radicalising in ways that both endangers freedom, and the party that advocates freedom.
We, as republicans need to be respectful to stay on top. When we debate using slanders against one another, or slanderize another's arguement, we lower ourselves to the public's high standard. If a democrat, socialist, or fascist tries to slanderize us, what should we do? We should argue about the facts and logic, not about their, or our flaws. We all have flaws, and it is rediculous to point them out. I may be an arrogant, overly confident person, but that by no means will effect my policy towards myself, nor will it towards others. If a person throws insults to you, the way you get back at them will show whether or not you are a real politician and a real man. When someone throws an insult to you, you throw facts, figures, and logic of your arguement, as they obviously couldn't counter. When someone cusses, upon you, your policies, or your values, you do not do the same, lest you jeopardize yourself, and others of your party. When you take no heed to their call for blood, and stay above the petty barfight, you do not merely look like a good person, but you look like a good leader. We are also a party, and as such we need to support one another. Debate is perfect for our rebel streak, but we musn't let division kill us off as a terror to big government advocates. We need to help one another in debate, knowledge and respect. We need to elevate ourselves from petty arguements into the realm of friendly, civil debates ranging on any issue, and show how truly advanced we are from the left's slanderization of ourselves.
We need to unite, and liberate the political world from thinking we are all people who say one thing and do another. We need to stay true to our values, our policies, and our ethics. When we stray, the world looks upon us in a rather unchivalrous way that is unbecoming of us all, in both parties. Teddy roosevelt was an adventurer. He loved to go to new places and loved to fight with his fellow party in order to get his view across. We can do the same, but we must not divide our party along irretrievable lines for which we cannot cope. We need to acknowledge we do have different ethics, values, and viewpoints, but we can help one another defeat the enemy of our viewpoints in a respectful and wonderful way that boggles the mind. When we share facts, figures and show how truly advanced we are, the founding fathers who may or may not disagree with us, will smile. When we use civility and not barbarian insults, is the day Abraham Lincoln looks down from heaven and wispers his grace upon us and grants us a better tomorrow, for which we all want and need.
So, my party, the GOP, I need you to consider what I have said, for I fear our demise may occur in the near, or far future, and it may be our, and our next generation's fault.
Thank you for your time, and I thank all those that completely read this.
I personally believe in the ideals of honour, respect and mutual love of fellow man. I know the United States as an American, a Portuguese, and a German. I know that we aren't a perfect country, but then again, what country is perfect?
I am writing to you all today, not as a politician, but as a statesman who advocates changes in our currently defunct system of governance.
Currently we are in a deficit which no one sees a return from, and a deficit which will likely destroy us. We do not have any money, as all of it belongs to foreign countries of which, China can safely dominate should we falter from world prominance.
I advocate for an end to the idea of a state as a mere organ of the main federal government. I ask, why have a federation? Federations always leads to unions, which always lead to dictatorship in one form or another, and it is not a question of right or left that bothers me.
I personally advocate a form of government where the government is an organ of the states that make up the confederation. Yes ladies and gentlemen, I believe in Confederation, a loosely organized governance system where the states that make up the confederation have all the rights, while the main government is extremely small and is primarily concerned with defence and taxes.
The governance system of our current political groups is appaling. There are no rights accorded to states, as states can bully other states through a multitude of non-state bodies, from which cronyism and bribery can come forth. The people of the states hire a leader, a governor to lead the state in accordance with state and federal law and is primarily concerned with governance and distribution of tax income. The congressmen/women and senators are concerned with having their state's ideals spread to one another in the hopes of encouraging that particular ideology, no matter how defunct.
The governance system I propose is one where there are senators and congressman, but instead of worrying about states, they worry about national defence and defending our rights. They must also act as a measure to make sure a state or a group of states do not have a monopoly or they do not have rights accorded to their populaces as put forth by the constitution and bill of rights.
I believe in the idea that all people were created equal. I believe that since we were created equal, at our core we are all equal, however I also believe in the idea that we were created equal, not the idea that we are forever equal, at least in a monetary sense. I believe that redistribution of wealth is a terrible idea and leads to terrible corruption, from which we cannot cope. Corruption leads to insurrection and insurrection leads to collapse.
The idea of a federal state was made by a group of people who though that instead of having a group of countries made up of the same people, they should be united, albeit with a governance over the states, while allocating rights to the states in order to keep them in line.
We need to realize that the idea of a super state, where a state is created of, by and "for" states is now defunct in the highest of regards, as it lead to our notion of having the allpowerful allknowing union, which is now rapidly disintigrating. In order to have a working union, we need to destroy, and rebuild the idea behind the union, what the union is, and how we govern in the union.
A confederation would work to our liberty oriented tastes, as a nation of farmers, businessmen, politicians, and workers. We were the first to discover and invent a multitude of ideas, manufactured goods, and services. We were the first to truly understand what it means to be free. Now we need to reclaim that, in a much more radical, yet profoundly unprovocative way.
Natural law dictates that there must be people on top to direct the lower part, and only the lower part, then the lower part directs that action to the next lower part only, and so on. It is found in all things science. It is found in the animal kingdom, and it is found in humanity. We need to have the confederal government on top, but with very limited powers, then have the states below it, with extensive power invested in them, then lower is the countys, which too will have much power, then the cities and towns, which also will have much power.
Here is how I would wish the rights and regulations to be handled and assembled.
The confederal government would have the right to raise and lower taxes, but would have a limit set by each state to match their max for the people to handle acceptably. The States would have the rights to do anything the majority of their populace agrees upon, as long as it doesn't infringe upon the constitution. The states cannot push through legislation to force other states to their will, however another state can come to be like another state if the majority agrees to it. The Counties would have the right to refuse to go along with a State law/bill/etc., if a majority of the populace disagrees with it, and it does not infringe upon rights. The Cities/Towns can refuse a county/state decision if a majority disagrees/agrees with something, but either the county or state disagrees/agrees with said act/bill/etc., as long as it does not infringe upon rights.
This will make sure everything has a check and a balance as accorded by the constitution.
We cannot argue for freedom, when our own states, which were made by us, for us, and of us, are no longer at their own wills. We are not a single nation. We are a federation of many nations that gave up the title of nation, in exchange for state. The day we lose our states rights is the day we lose our own rights.
When we think of states rights and the civil war, we oft think of racism and slavery at first. We need to realize that states rights was the cause of the civil war, along with slavery, and that slavery is not what states rights stands for. When the union emerged from the civil war victorious, we southerners asked ourselves... What next? We were answered by decades of depression and hate fuled racism. I am not saying that if we let the south loses slavery on its own that racism wouldn't continue, but states rights did vanish after the civil war, and the southern states were regulated and controlled completely by the north, which resulted in collapse. Slavery is evil and all things similiar to it deserve to be rewarded with disestablishment. We should not use affirmative action, but rather a reperation system, or a trip to africa program, once the states start profiting once more.
States rights ended with the civil war's last bullet. It didn't really end, it just began. I fear not just for my own two home states, but for your own state, and for all states, as once the government gets too fat, it will pop, and states will become countries and countries will wage wars on one another, and that will lead to the greatest lost of life... this entire century. I kid you not, for we must look to the past for certain examples. Look to Ausria and the Northern German Confederation. They too were in dissolusion and lost great amounts of life and protitted none. Until the Germans united, they did not profit too terribly much, just was the case for many kingdoms that became countries, and then states. Look at yugoslavia, in unity, it profitted, well, before ww2, and after its dissolusion, it face utter genocide and disaster.
We need to advocate states rights, not as people who want disbandment, but as disenfranchised americans who face an ever growing, ever oppressive government that threatens more and more every day to us all, with destruction, genocide, and loss of all things good.
That is why I believe in the constitution and bill of rights. I believe that all men are created equal and that so are states. When the federal government becomes the only government, is the day neither of those two documents mean nothing to us, and to the politicians who offer nothing but old promises and false hopes.
We need to look at the Green ideology of making the world less polluted not as an economic hinder, but as a catalyst. We need to change how we want to get corporation to change. Grants, trading practices, tax credits, and our own federal research can indeed change the scope of this green movement. We can, I believe, make money off of this. If we encourage green job growth without forcing companies to layoff non-green jobs, then we can make sure everyone keeps their jobs while the company "goes green." We do not need cap-n-trade, but we do need motive. If the government tells you to do something, you probably don't want to do it as it will hurt you, but if the government gives you an offer of research, or tax cuts or contracts, etc., then you are much more likely to take a much quicker change, while preserving jobs.
We need to create federal programs that reward all types of research that can help our, and the world's people. It should also have the possibility of making us a little bit richer as well. We should also focus on promoting companies to convert to greener sources of energy through tax cuts, if necissary. We can also fund research into non-petrol energy sources as much as possible, and try to implement them. We need to find a source of energy that is both productive and as non polluting as possible, such as Nuclear power. Cold Fission is maybe a hundred years away, but we do need to fund research for it, so it won't take longer than one hundred years. We should look into clean coal energy, as many countries on earth use very cheap coal. We also have a lot of cheap coal, and if we were to start converting to clean coal energy, we could drive up the exportation prices and make some good money.
I'm not saying we need to fund public outreach programs, because certain organizations do that already. We also need to make sure to not focus entirely on being green, because if we do, we can remove many good jobs for many good americans. We can also work with other nations on this idea, if necissary.
We could create a capping program where we set limits, set for each industry, not all in one, that allows growth, and a reasable cap as to limit pollution. Global Warming is still being debated, but air pollution is something terrible that hurts, regardless of its effects on the earth as a whole. I would not want the government to make the caps for each industry/company, as I believe specialists from the fields of economics, environment, and production specialists should all make them, for each of their industries, as to make it fair and quite possible for companies to accomplish without forcing jobs out.
I believe in making not just the Earth greener, but also our wallets.
The Science Czar Mr. Obama chose promises many "progressive" things, one of them is making people infertile by putting drugs in the water or in our food.
He means it too... And he knows obama.
Another thing he promises is forced abortions for unwed pregnancies, no matter what stage the pregnancy is, even if it is a month away.
He can do those things................ and more.......
He has only obama to watch over him... and he can convince either obama or the CIA director to do a repeat of...
MKULTRA on a much larger and much more unkeenly genocidal way, and without our CONSENT OR APPROVAL.
I'm not sure... but if i were to be infertile, that means I will never have a child again... neither will all of you...
and this man can do all he promises...
Not to be racist against my own race, but men like him, are usually racist against white people because he feels guilty for all we've done in history...
So maybe... just maybe... he will order a drug for only whites to be effected... and infertilized...
God forbid this man stay in power a second longer...
God give him hell, or give him hell.
God bless the USA, the real usa, not the fascist genocidal usa...
When we hear about this man, mister Harry Alford, one might originally think he is an overly politically correct man whose leanings is of a black man above a human man, but upon closer inspections, one must realize the context of his arguement of the Senator being condencending, and the fact that the NAACP statement was too general to mean anything.
Watch the video and judge for yourself.
I think he's a good man, and needs to be thought of as such.
I also read up on him, and he improved, wherever he is influential, black's lives extremely, as much as 500%! He is a true American hero in the markets, and on the frontlines of Political correctness racism.
In Nazi Germany, the workers had no rights, even though the ruling party was the German National Socialist Workers Party [NSDAP-'nazi']. The government forbade workers from even the right to quit their jobs. The workers were beaten if they refused to follow rules or demand better conditions. The government gave them something the world later used, one month of vacation, and being able to use any amount of days or weeks they want, whenever. This confused even the most ardent of rebellious workers. The government even put in orchestras and operas in major factories, and the workers applauded them. The workers were very happy-they had vacations, jobs, and music. However, they had no rights. It was like having a prisoner have all the realities of life outside of jail, but while being in jail and being able to be shot for anything. The German Workers were held hostage by their own government. Eventually the labour demand in germany was so great that the government used communists, jews, homosexuals, and anybody who wasn't german, as slaves who were unpaid workers who worked all day and night, until they died. The only good man in that who laborbalooza was a Feldmarshall Erwin Rommel, a swabian, who actually paid the afrikan workers he had in north afrika, and gave them many breaks. He also refused to kill any jews or "anti-germans," going against hitler's direct orders.
Today, yesterday, and many days ago, our democratic party of America, said they wanted national healthcare, ie welfare. The Nazis gave the workers national healthcare so they wouldn't revolt, and it worked, they went along with the charade till the bitter end of National Socialism in Germany.
National healthcare over here would fail miserably, as we are a different people than the germans, and our own national democrat party has very similiar but different views on foreign relations and on immigration.
The National Socialists restricted immigration, and deported germans who were not in and of germany before a certain year, while the democrats wants everyone to be in America [I have nothing against that].
The National Socialists restricted the rights of Workers to the bone, but instead of workers muscle [rights], they gave them fat [welfare], while the democrats want to take away the rights of the employer to the bone, and then give them fat through being green, clean, and immigrant friendly, as to make money being appealing to the populace [probably won't work].
The National Socialists believe in Keynesian economics, which means using stimulus money, and massive building projects to make temporary jobs, which the Democrats also endorse.
The National Socialists believe in taking the rights away from people and giving them fat from the government, which the democrats now, and in the past have espoused, ever since they wanted slavery to continue, despite republican's wishes for abolition of slavery. Now the Democrats want to take away our health rights, our rights to be politically incorrect, and our right to dissent.
I am not against the democrats personally, but I am against their policies, for which, they do so in an extremely unconstitutional way. But have no fear, as a populace can be pushed to far, and the day we lose our right to protest, is the day a second american revolution shall come forth to liberate us all from oppression, be it under republicans or quite probably, democrats. We need to understand that nationalizing everything isn't the way to go. Giving the companies to "Czars," isn't the answer, giving it "to the people," [meaning the Government which can't manage anything] and giving the power to the unions all the time, isn't the answer, but following the constitution and actually living, seeing, and breathing it is the answer, because it made us a superpower, while being isolated from the world, basically, it made us a giant in a cave, but now that we rebuilt the cave, we are a speck in a Cave, due to our expansionistic policies not only in military, diplomacy, but also in economy. Before ww1, we were isolated from the world and were self sufficent and traded mostly surplus [yes, surplus], and we thrived. Now, because of interventionalism [which isn't always bad], and the fact that we didn't return to ourselves instead of governing the world, then that means we were doomed to fall, as we are a people of isolation, growth, and of family. We are not policemen, communists, or welfare people who want only to take other's money for themselves [not all on welfare are bad, but people who want what the government give are homeless and they want to, which means money to them for saying they want to work and will try to find some, but not actually doing so]. We need to privitize, not nationalize. Look at how messed up the Soviet Union was. They had national healthcare, nationalized car factories, that belonged to their country [as GM belongs to "the US people], their people "owned" everything, even though if they tried to dissent they were sent to the KGB to be "re-educated," [tortured] and the children even turned in their own parents as "capitalists," now I ask you all, do you want to be hated for believing we all have a right to be rich, or poor based on how hard we work, learn, and strive for?
I hope your answer is no, or else we will all share a similiar future.
This specific blog is not mocking obama the man, but rather his policies with the states, their rights, the military, and the people.
Mr. Obama believes keyneism, which is the economic philosophy of building a nation to make money by giving jobs, which will go away after the initial bonus of the act of building. However, unlike its other advocate, a Mr. Hitler, he does not believe in massive military building or actions related thereof, which means that once the building ends, if it ever starts, the jobs will go away, but the debt will remain.
Keyneism doesn't work, as it is inherently flawed, as it all economics based on a currency system where a value is assigned, but misunderstood.
A resource based economy would work best, but until then, we need to regulate our money and not spend it, anywhere, to raise its value which is plummeting. We need to cut the fat out of government, not add to it.
The more we add, the more we lose... In the long run, well... more like our children lose when china buys america for a few million.
Or worse yet, obama becomes a new totalitarian, or some other party rises to dominate and control, which could be any party, as humans are opportunistic, and if the country falters to a greater degree than in the 30's, then a totalitarian future be ours.
We need to cut out the fat of the government, and cut up the government, and give governance back to the states, where it belongs and is assigned by the constitution.
When we do, and let states go their own way, without forcing other states to concede to their views, then we will have a much better economy, as states know how to reglate themselves, as they are all different. It doesn't make sense when Alaska can be dominated by Rhode Island or any state for that matter.
When we get back our rights, then we can grow like we did in the twentieth and nineteenth centuries. Days like those, of glory, honor, and respect, may be fargone nowadays, but I hold their values true, of hard work, true freedom and of respect for fellow man regardless of ideology.
Why is it, that people are being told by people here that because they moved here legally, or not, that they don't have a right to be here? Just imagine yourself in their shoes. Now, imagine what we can do to improve.
We change the tax code so even illegals pay, maybe using sales tax instead of income tax, that way everyone pays the same amount in a fair and equitable way.
Legalize all who live here at this moment.
End border controls, save for drug precautions.
Try to legalize certain drugs.
Make sure to set up rehabilitation centers, just in case.
Then, instead of spending on building new roads, fix the current ones, as they really need improvement, and since we would all be legal, we'd all get the money.
Then feel glad about being American again,
Then act like that great president Teddy Roosevelt, who stood up for the common man, loved true honest capitalism, but hated monopolies and likewise hated similiar large corporate interests.
We enact regulations, but not too many, making sure they are as simple and easy to follow as possible, that make sure businesses do not exploit workers domestic or abroad, that make sure there are environmental standards, however, they should be individualized for each company/industry, as they are all different, and need specific plans in order to help, not hurt them, and the environment, then have regulations against monopolies.
Then once we feel better about our economy, ban bailouts from occurring as they are inherently against our capitalistic free market system of economics.
Once we get through all that, then we can stop the federal reserve and end it. Once we do, then we need to simply put: cut out [b]ALL[/b] of the fat from the government, and give it to the states, then give the remaining constitutionally assigned rights to the extremely small federal government, making sure such gross overuse of governance never occurs again, possibly through laws.
Then when we are making money, we need to stop making so much money, to raise our currency value. We should work towards paying off debts with any surplus, as even with surplus, we will die out.
Then, when all that is done, we need to cut aid entirely to the U.N as it is a purely evil organization that does nothing to help anyone, unless they are rich with rich friends. Then we need to cut aid to israel, saving us vast amounts of money, while still trading with them, or any nation that is willing to trade. Once we withdraw from the middle east and are safe.
Then we can work towards another step: The reservist military force that should have been.
We need to cut spending to the military extensively, and turn it into a reserve force, that can have people on call to be put into active service, in times of crisis and war, while those who sign up for the "roll call list," would train weekly, or monthly, depending on the state and their needs. There can still be the opportunities of the military for the populace, such as through military universities/high schools, etc., while being paid by the student, and possibly the state/government, the student would have to be put on the call up list for a certain time, as set by the state.
I believe in the idea of state militias [national guard] in a metaphorical sense, and a literal one. I believe vehemently in gun rights, and I believe that maybe some states with high crime rates could have a "beefed up" neighborhood watch program, with certain individuals, who are trained by the police, to be a militia of the people, by the people, for the people, aiding the police by helping to police to focus on larger things than what a neighborhood can face.
You know, I say all this because I believe in the social justification of immigration in a time of great need for jobs, and an end to deficits and the spending during them.
We need to take in people, not exclude them. Or else we'll surely face a terrible future, as hatred breeds hatred.
So I ask all of you now, to look not at exclusion, but inclusion, and in the ideals of small rules all, where your community town hall is the most governmetn you have to worry about.
An young man turns a new age and has only one thing to get, a disease for which there is no cure, at least for him. He dies slowly and painfully in a punishment no human should bear, save for criminals. But, since he cannot be liberated from the shackles of his body for legal reasons, he dies slowly in agony crying out to others to pull the plus and to end it so he can start a new life, in whatever life waits beyond.
Euthanesia isn't evil.
That is what happens to thousands every year.
It should be legal, but with many restrictions as suicide is a bad thing.
The firefighters who are sueing sotomayor have a right to, they were wronged of a job, just because they were white.
They, the firefighters, all of them, white, latino, black, etc., were taking a promotion test, to see who will be promoted, or something along those lines, and it turned out that the whites scored better than the others. That isn't racist, it could be for reasons of education or environment of living, etc., and only when you make it based on skin, does affirmative action take place, which occurred, and prevented honest hardworking firefighters from getting what they worked for simply because they weren't the right skin color.
Affirmative action is the idea of forcing businesses to hire equal or copious amounts of blacks, females, latinos, etc., into businesses instead of white. Basically, if you go to a business with affirmative action as law, and if you're white, you may have more qualifications than others, but you won't get the job. That is blatant racism and needs to be stopped immediately. If we don't, and it is accepted as part of society, well, you can imagine what it would be like for whites everyone a mere 100 years later. Anything could be possible.
Some people think racism can only be from whites, and believe me, i've met people like that, and they blame me for everything wrong with them, and they usually do all they can to cause me grief by calling me a slaver, racist, evil bigot, etc., when in reality, I have friends of many nationalities and colors.
I even met a man who said if you weren't a minority, and disagreed with obama, then you were a terrible racist, almost if not as bad as KKK members. And that's another problem, there are many racist black gangs, just like the KKK, only for black supremacy.
I support freedom, not totalitarianism, and affirmative action is a form of that, forcing comapanies to do things. I do support diversity, but I also have common sense. Another form of totalitarianism is telling us what is/isn't safe, and the war on drugs, and the possible ban on vicadyn are shows of that. Vicodyn and other similiar drugs are used for people who need that as they couldn't live good lives without it.
Then there's Sotomayor. She is the one who ruled in Affirmative action's favor and barred those firefighters from jobs because they were white and not the right color for such promotion [as it seems]. Then it is found out she said something racist, but since she's latina, it isn't under the same controversy as if a white person said a similiar thing. This media portrayel is also racist. Sotomayor basically said she thought a latina was wiser than a white man. That can be true for some, of both sides of that quote, whites, and latinas, it is not true for all, and saying they all are, is obviously wrong, and racist.
Now, do we really want such a women who advocates such policies for such a high place as supreme court, who has almost, if not as much power as senate and congress?
I know I don't. I am white, and I supported/love the Good Doctor, Martin Luther King Jr., who believed EVERYONE, regardless of nationality, race, or religion deserve the same rights by all and the same respect by all.
There used to be a time where men wore hats of great height, and women wore beautiful dresses that would cost thousands nowadays. There used to be a time of the model T, where men wore suits to work and used suspenders liberally. Women eventually [during a time of great growth] wore extremely radical clothing for their time and engaged in activities of a radical nature. Then there was the time of patriots who united against a country who bloodied the future state of america. Then there was the time of sailors and soldiers returning home from a massive war, where they were conservative in much and tried to instill a sense of honor and duty in their children. Some accepted, and some refused, with the latter defining an entire generation. Then the children of those that refused their parents became rather self oriented and began schemes and scams to take money for themselves while taking it from others. Then there came the current generation. They were born from the majority whom didn't refuse authority. They became workers, soldiers, and many were raised in middle class homes. Overall, life was good. Over these generations we lost one major thing that we needed to survive not as a country, but as a people, the idea of rebelliousness. Without rebels there is no need to stay united.
We are a people born from rebellion, and the day we lose it, is the day we are no longer a united people. There is a limit to everything however, and the limit is being reached.
I beseech that almighty god grant province to the cause of justice and freedom and prevent the racist sotomayor from becoming a justice, while preventing a dictatorship called democracy by a regime that recognizes not a party but an idea, an idea of mercantilism and totalitarianism through subtle means.
I ask that almighty god grant us our lives and our daily bread, as we march to a time and generation that knows only turmoil, trial, failure, and death. If we survive, then I bless that generation to a grand future without such evil that we face, knowing that they too will have descendants that refuse the gift of freedom, and shall do all they can do to prevent it.
I ask that the almighty above grant me this gift, the gift of freedom, that I take most humbly, as it is the most dangerous gift a human can ever have. I only hope that we don't lose that humbleness, lest we lose the gift.
We are the people of the nation that bore fruit, a sweet fruit of most forbidden proportions, a fruit called freedom. It grew to a tree and spread its seed around the world. Now is the time that it is decaying and will die. The question is, whether or not a new tree will be planted or not.
We all fear death, and that is what keeps us from such acts as protest, but in reality, we all will die, the only thing that changes in death is how we die, and how we are remembered. I will die, and I will not concern myself with it, as I have a time to die, a day to die, and I will never know it, but I will do all I can to live for the day that I be living in.
I ask my fellow people not to look backwards into an era of turmoil and uncivility, but to look forward to an era of truth, honesty, and love of fellow man.
It will get worse, before it gets better.
I say this not as a republican, but rather as an American asking for a change, not in government, but in the men that elect the government.
This does not relate to any particular issue, but rather the issue of change of heart in my fellow man. We do change, many times over many generations, but one thing that doesn't seem to change is our sense of self gratification. Why must we feel good about ourselves and do what we can for ourselves even if at other's expense. It is common to all generations and all people, but... but if we change that... Nothing is impossible.
The issues that the nature of man can change, mainly are; everything.
If we change immigration and the tax system at the same time, we can safely open the borders and have taxes fairly and for all, regardless of social status. If we change who is in charge, we can change ourselves through a common hero. If we change who we let judge us for our character, and choose someone well, then we can have fair judgement for all, regardless of what they are. If we change how we view science, then we can motivate a whole generation to become geniuses among the world. If we change how we view our physical bodies, then we can motivate millions to lose weight in a non-forced way.
I speak not of any particular issue, and I say this out of concern for personal attack, but I do speak of a change in human nature as needed for our country's survival, if not just our own.
"If something doesn't bend, it breaks."
We need to unite as Americans, not just as democrats, liberals, republicans, conservatives, socialists, independants, or libertarians. We are one America, not red and blue states.
Times are changing, because we ourselves are changing. Right now, for the worse quite possibly, or, if we change our very moral fiber and who we are, then for the better.
The fact of the matter is; we will lose any war in the middle east, russia, central asia, or anywhere outside of our own hemisphere, as we will always be seen as an invader and oppressor. Look at nazi germany in the soviet union. They had partisan problems which ended up costing them the war. Now fast forward to our war in Iraq and Afghanistan. We are overstretched, like the germans, and we are vulnerable at home, and abroad, extremely vulnerable, unlike germany. We rely on other countries for production, yet we flimsily enable shipping to go along unpeturbed and without escort through tiny channels of entry and exit; panama, persian gulf, the suez canal, singapore. The fact of the matter is, not only do we leave those places, and the ships that traverse these hostile waters unguarded, but we leave our own people unguarded. A terrorist could easily use household products and make a biobomb that could kill thousands. A terrorist could easily obtain an airplane, and not crash it, but instead use it to arm an emp device which would cause mass blackouts for millions. Then there's the hacking issue. A hacker can easily hack into the CIA, FBI, etc. They can also hack into our security systems, energy networks, etc. This is something that may hinder us. The next problem is nuclear. Russia used to be strong, but now it has a foot in anarchy and the other in crime. Right now, briefcase sized nuclear devices are being bought and sold which could kill hundred of thousands easily, and millions with radiation. Terrorists could also become busdrivers for our children's busses, although that would incite hate amongst us against them, so they might not do that. They could easily siphen out money from our treasury through hacking. We lose our money every day as millions get hacked and lose vital information. A terrorist could easily go into a hospital and set off an explosion in the bottom parts, or worse yet, spread anthrax through the ventilation system. In the decabes before now, a cult in oregon used non-deadly biological weapons to take control of a county to build a bigger cult ranch. They used samonila in the food that people ate, as they slipped them into the foods when no one was looking. Thousands became violently ill, and they nearly won the county elections, but they lost. This is testament to how easily biobombs are made/obtained. The weapons they used were made using household products and they also had a very lethal and banned bioweapon that makes someone burn up [if i read right] and boil from the inside out, conscious till the end. If a cult with primitive technology can do this, then imagine what a well funded terrorist cell could do. Then there's the issue of those tight sea lanes. A terrorist could take a small ship with a sizeable bomb, and blow up near an oil tanker or other massively devastating ship and could kill thousands, and if radiation would occur, millions.
Basically what I'm saying is that no one is safe 'at home' anymore. The homefront is the battlefront. We cannot use tyranical methods to control violence, but we must do something. But what can we do? We face an enemy that uses our occupation of their lands as a weapon. How do we beat them? We leave them be in their lands. If the people don't want them there, then they themselves will vanquish them.
Millions will die in this "new crusade." But thus is war.
WARNING some may find picture at bottom rather disturbing.
States are legal entities in our grand union, and what they do should be up to their descretion. When other states interfere, there will be trouble, not just for the state being controlled, but for others. Right now States are becoming stronger and more freedom oriented. There used to be a time where we referred to ourselves as singularly American, but now, we not only are American, but we are Idahoan, Californian, Texan, etc. Not only are we becoming more rebellious, but for many, we are getting smarter about what is going on in washington from both parties. We realize that neither offer change and that they only select their candidates based on who will accomplish the most for their party and who is the most corruptible. Not only do we realize this, but many state governors realize this as much if not more, as they are forced to take government money to "improve" when in reality this forces them into debt to the government and only continues the oppression of the masses, as now we all owe the government millions. My own home state was doing rather well, and the recession was hitting, but we were going to make it through rather well. I personally believe that people from their own state can run them better than men in washington whose viewpoint on the economy is 'how much can I squeeze out of it." If we let states run themselves then we will end up better. America started as a confederation of states acting as one in order to survive. Then the civil war changed all that. The issue that started the civil war was not necissarily slavery, it was states rights. The southern states didn't want the northerners to interfere in their governments, but the north felt it necissary, and thus it was inevitable an explosion would happen. Slavery is a horrible thing and is pure evil, but states rights aren't. We deserve the right to govern ourselves the way we want to. If we act as a single entity, then we lose our individuality, and we lose our way of life. If a republican or democrat in vermont wants to run idaho, then they should move over here and live like the locals. If they want to dominate us and ruin our lives, then they should just stay in vermont. If we want to change, we must change not our nation, but the state of our nation. We need to change our government for total states' rights. If we recognize states make up the union, and if we weren't united, then we'd all be rather poor, then the government should change for the better. We need states to have their own problems so they can solve them without washington saying yay or nay. If California wants a bailout, then the states who want to give them money can, but my state won't and I want the government to respect that.
Basically I'm saying, states rights are the foundation of this union, and we need to respect that, lest we disolve such a union.
I recently read about how the mormon religion is the fastest growing religion around the world, and so I asked a few mormon friends of mine, [since I live in Idaho, state above utah] and they agreed because of the fact that they have worldwide missions that are wildly succesful. Now, how this relates to politics I will explain.
If a man has his ideals instilled by his religion, and be that religion a missionary religion [such as christianity or islam] then how can he not wish to spread his ideals to others? Thus raises the question, if a man of any religious values raises to power, can there truly be seperation of church and state?
Now back on topic. The mormon religion is basically a religion that bases its teachings upon a man who recieved a revelation by god and retrieved golden plates and deciphered them by an angel's help. The tablets said jesus visited the lost tribe from the bible when he came back to life. Then the tablets become a sort of history about north america from the tribe's perspective and it talks about how they split. The Mormons are conservatives at heart, and some atribute this to their growth as many parents fear their kids becoming what the older generations call "the lazy generation," of obvious laziness not only on work but on matters of politics, religion, and on other things. marriage is also something time honored in the church and divorce is something frowned upon. Others atribute the growth to its ideals about the afterlife, which they believe we go to certain types of heavens based on our actions in life.
As the world thrusts itself into an era of globalization, the powers that be have made government an oddity, as massive multinationals seem to endorse certain parties in the hopes of picking the winner and thus gaining influece, and it seems that certain big players chose the right one with obama. I must ask if this will hurt the democrats as the current administration seems to be flaunting itself as the vanguard of justice when it does not act in iran even with their cries for justice and aid. This same thing is happening to the republicans, but in different ways, and on different issues.
Is this the start of a new era, with two opposite parties duking it out, instead of democrats and republicans, with constitutionists and libertarians, or will both conservatives and democrats pull out swinging and realize they work for the people and not the companies?
Let freedom reign over these lands, as man set forward to make such a goal a reality after millenia of struggle and disease. Wars have been waged, and many a man whom we shall never know died for the idea of having a good life, one where they and their family are secure, where their community is safe, and where they can have power in their nation. Basically they wanted something close to a utopia. These men were not redcoats, bluecoats, tyrants, warmongers, liberals, conservatives, etc, they were average family men. They were romans, germanians, franks, alemanni, celtic, scandinavian, slavic, kazak, cosack, polish, english, etc., but above all else, they were all humans we can associate with. They were fishers, farmers, workers, executives, leaders, politicians, and even slaves. They were men who worked all day to come home and see their kids and smile knowing they had a future they all were happy and proud with. They wanted their children to inherit a world of plenty; plentiful jobs, food, education and health. Wars have been waged, dictatorships have risen and fallen, gangs have been formed and died out. Overall, man originally thought violence was the answer, and even today they still do. When one man, an average man, not too much, or too little education, with a family, and a job, finally got fed up with an oppressive government that took his money where he would never find it again, and where the police took charge and chained men to a slavery unpronounced. This man went by the name of Paine. He finally got fed up to boiling point, and what he did, was so radical, it changed him, his family, and his world for the better. He wrote about his anger about the nonsense going on in this world. And because of that little book, he started a revolution. His ideas of free market, freedom for all without exception, low taxes to the bone, of a military of the people for the people, of a government by the people and fearing of the people, of a place where a man can walk up to another man and talk about the weather without the fear of political and imperial oppression. Basically, Paine wanted a better world. In the drudgery and filth he was born in, he cleaned to sparkle, just for his kids, and all kids. Simply put, he was a patriot. He wanted free immigration for all, and a government that recognized we all deserve the rights that are only found here, in America.
Those principles are lost now, and the debates have slowly changed to show our changed ideals.
Now the debates are on if we should close the border and deport, then there are debates on how much the economy needs in regulation, then there are debates on how big the government should be and if it should make us all fat and lazy, and then there are debates on whether or not the military should go here, or there, and it really just goes to show how stupid the people in washington take us for. They think we want to be fat [literally] on free things. They want us to take all their things, they basically want to make us all have an addiction on the government. They want us to smoke it and breathe it in and do anything to get that "high" again. This is intolerable. Then they say that if you were born in mexico your not american and you never can be. This cannot stand. If a man born a foreigner raises his children in freedom with love in his heart and a pride in community, he has every right to be here and to live. Then the government wants more taxes. They are fat there too, and are too high on their own pride and egos to see what it does. They make us addicted to their policies, then they take away our meat after we are fatter. By the time they give up and do something else, we will be but bones and dust. Then, and most disturbingly, the military seems to be at the mercy of those high fatcats in washington, and seem to do along with it. They are our children, brothers, sisters, aunts, nephews, neices, etc., and the government is turning them into slaves. This is unacceptable and is completely evil beyond word. It is terrible to hear my father say he is in the military, and if the government said so, he's have to shoot innocent Americans for some accusation. While he never said such a thing, we know it true. When we the people come together out of love of fellow man and out of patriotism and pride in our country, the government is realizing we are refusing to shoot up on their dope policies. We are prisoners in our own nation. The men in women in uniform are heroes, they give their lives for us, even though they work for the government. They really work for the people, and they deserve to know that too. If that happens, then the doped up fatcats will have no power, and if they do anything, well they would be much better to be dead that where they would be if they tried to make us high again.
We the people, in order to establish a more perfect union, must rebel against the drug peddlers called government. We need to protest, non-violently, as the day of guns over talk have passed. The days of rebellion against authority will never end as long as Americans exist. It's in our blood-we just need to find that gene and activate it. Once we do-we will win.
We will win... a victory sweeter than the sweetest of candies... we will inherit... a land of endless possibility... a land where we let those who are good enter our land without walls in the way of patriotism from to-be americans... we will win a land where the government fears the people... we will win a land so free, crime isn't a possibility... a land that lets men succede and strike it rich... a land where if you have no values of gold and morals, you aren't going to win, as the people will recognize you as a tyrant. Overall, we will inherit the dreams of our predecessors from the dawn of man till now... only their dreams will come true.
This isn't a dream in itself. It's a philosophy... a political party... a reactionary front... a idea... a love... a land... a people... a group... it's everything and everyone American. There is no party but the party-of the everyman. There is no name for it as all are invited, and all are respected.
We can do this, we landed a man on the moon, we ended ww2, we made the atomic bomb, we discovered many dimensions, we had einstein, paine, washington and thousands others, we invented freedom the american way, we invented the idea of isolationist internationalism, we helped millions, and we made dreams come true, overall, we've done more than any other country.
We can do this! This isn't an idiotic call to arms, it's an idea that I hope my fellow American take up with me, and help spread to all, regardless of what they are, for it is who they are that matters.
The days of tyrants are gone, now let us end the last one in America!
Длиной тому назад, люди были сильны, высокорослы, и независим. Они положились на их семьях и на их общине. Они поохотились в пущах, пустынях, и за пределами, но с другой стороны измененном что-то. Как человек который был раз среди их, был руководителем и устанавливал происхождение основанное на крови, другие люди стали подобострастный. Они интересовали и мысль и окончательно были сильными как только больше, и они взбунтовали. После этого они основали страну и она была основана на свободе, народовластии и свободном рынке. Сегодня, люди aren' t приравнивает, и они ненавидят одно другое для очень плохих причин. Сегодня, люди aren' t воинственно настроенный и как таковой, не более длиной имеет 3 принципа его праотцы установленные передними дальше. Теперь люди принуждаются в клетки как скотины перед убоем. Скоро Америка будет нацией третия мир, если человек не будет изменять. Как только politicans делают нами третьи worlders, тогда коммунисты примут обязанность, или фашистов… После этого мы поистине будем смотреть на геноцид. В виду того что политическая правильность теперь закон, ко времени " новое era" где мы все скотины перед правительством, белизны могут очень хлынуться сторона геноцид, или хотя бы очень плохое будущее, как группы некоторых экстремистов могут возникнуть для того чтобы привести в действие и закончили бы вверх преследуя по суду белизны как преступники, даже одни которые не делали ничего. Это не может случиться, но возможность. Эти же смогли быть для latinos, и азиатов. Пока белизны имеют одну главным образом расистскую группу, чернота имеет вокруг 3. черноты хорошие люди, как все люди, но страх других которые друг влияет на нацию третия мир, которая смогла случиться к Америка. Я нет расиста, я имею много друзей которые еврейски, mormon, черноты, asain, индейца, иранца, laosian, немецких, и французское одно. Расизм реальн, и как раз потому что белизна узнает что белизны донятые временами doesn' t делает мной расиста. Придумка США нацией третия мир нет не радикальное одно, а очень реальная возможность. Когда мы будем фашистскими или коммунистами, наиболее вероятновероятн latter, и если latter, то это как мы напишем, читаем и учим: Врусском. Как только мы потеряли все мы работали для: Равность, свобода, влюбленность товарища, чувство гордости в one' община s, и one' страна s, народовластие, наши права, и наш rebelliousness, после этого мы поистине потеряем Америка. К тем которые противоречат: Какразждитеисм. Когдаонслучится, я сказал вас так.
Long ago, men were strong, tall, and independant. They relied on their families and on their community. They hunted in forests, deserts, and beyond, but then something changed. As a man who was once among them, became leader and established a lineage based on blood, the other men became subservient. They wondered and thought and finally became strong once more, and they rebelled. Then they founded a country and it was based on freedom, democracy and free market. Today, men aren't equal, and they hate one another for very bad reasons. Today, men aren't rebellious and as such, no longer have the three principles his forefathers set forward on.
Now the men are being forced into cages like cattle before the slaughter. Soon America will be a third world nation, unless man changes. Once the politicans make us third worlders, then the communists will take charge, or the fascists... Then we will truly face a genocide. Since political correctness is now the law, by the time of the "new era" where we are all cattle before the government, the whites may very well face a genocide, or at least a very bad future, as some extremists groups may arise to power and would end up prosecuting whites as criminals, even the ones who have done nothing. This may not happen, but it is a possibility. The same could be for latinos, and asians. While whites have one main racist group, blacks do have around 3. Blacks are good people, as are all humans, but the fear of others who are different do affect a third world nation, which could happen to America. I am not a racist, I have many friends who are jewish, mormon, black, asain, indian, iranian, laosian, german, and a french one. Racism is real, and just because a white recognizes that whites are being persecuted at times doesn't make me a racist.
The notion of the US becoming a third world nation is not a radical one, but a very real possibility. When we do become fascist or communist, most likely the latter, and if the latter, this is how we will write, read and learn: В русском. Once we lost all we worked for: Equality, freedom, love of fellow man, a sense of pride in one's community, and one's country, democracy, our rights, and our rebelliousness, then we will truly lose America.
To those who disagree: Как раз ждите и см. Когда он случится, я сказал вас так.
If the Republicans are supposed to be financially conservative, and market liberal, then why didn't they lower taxes, and cut the fat off the government? The republicants are doing a terrible job, with infighting, scandals, and improper tactics when trying to gain votes, as they never fight out loud on the big vote winners.
The American people just want a leader who is much like Theodore Roosevelt, a man who hates how big business can exploit the government and the people, but also understands how business works, and can make America better, and yet help those less fortunate than he. He was an avid patriot who didn't abide by anyone but America's rules.
With the rise in global threats, we need someone who cares about the poor/middle class, and yet understands economics and how to gain profit while making sure that big business isn't omnipotent in the country and in its government.
Obama isn't that man.
I'm not sure if there is any politician nowadays that can't be corrupted, but if there isn't, then we can kiss our votes goodbye.
We the people, need to create a better union, and if we don't, then there will be succession of many states. I might even support a freed Cascadia, Confederacy, Vermont, Texas, and all of them, as their politicians aren't corrupted, even if they don't believe in the Union. I believe in the Union, but I don't believe in the representatives of the Union who pervert it, and ruin our hopes and goals for the future.
A house divided cannot stand.
If the GOP wants to survive, they need to rally behind that point, the idea of Saving America, and not some issue that the democrats put forward.
The republicans can survive and even make the democrats look at their own survival, if they use the right issues, and stop the terrible infighting and corruption that is plague-ing them right now. Once they do, then they will become the majority, but if they then revert back to nasty old habbits, then it will be the end for them, and if they don't change now, it will be the end, only sooner. If the GOP dies, I am sure that the libertarians will take their place.
We, as americans who claim to enforce the idea of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, always say that we give freely regardless of ideology. We claim that we give regardless of the country's economy. We say we give regardless of what the nation had done for us. Well, it is time to prove it to the peoples of nations that have yet to heal from the Soviet collapse. Poland is by far doing the best, but that is by no means an example for all the states of the east. The people there are very nice, warm, and accepting. I know a bunch of people from over there and they have better food than mc.d's, then again, anything is better n' fast food. All they want is freedom and a stable state of existance, but instead they are recieving the butt end of capitalism, along with other *non valuable* states. Their economies fluctuate much worse than ours, as nothing is taken for granted, and their people sometimes wonder about their jobs. while it is not in such a bad state as Afrika, it is still bad. They deserve stable states with stable economies. They need aid to overcome the tragedies of the soviet era, and to be able to move on into the new globalized, yet culturally/nationally patriotic era. They need to get aid that will not be accrued as debt, but as pure aid, like a man giving bread to a man on a street who is homeless. This will let them explode in growth and could make the East the new Asia, which would immensely benefit the aiders as the aided would surely be grateful.
WE THE PEOPLE [of the Earth] need to unite, and help one another, for once we do, we will unlock the gift of universal brotherhood. And once we do, we shall truly know happiness.
It is a simple, yet profound word. We use it when we feel as though we are being descriminated on some grounds, and we use it when we feel as though someone does not allow for our human worth to be shown forth to others. It also means respecting another man for what he is, what he does, and what he thinks. Our society nowadays doesn't seem too keen to adopt this idea. There is constantly fighting over whether or not gays deserve, notice I say deserve, marriage. I say, why not? But to please both sides, why not have 2 seperate, yet unique marriages? A heterosexual one and a homosexual ones, with different names, but same legality?
Then there's the issue of gun ownership. We are Americans, and the average American isn't about to go on a killing spree, although some will, and that is why we need to be allowed to use/own them. If a man in the military can handle a machine gun in battle, I doubt he can't handle a pistol in his household.
Then there's national healthcare. We can use healthcare reform, but it needs to be done in a responsible way, or else we will suffer dire consequences.
Then there's the military. We need it to be a reservist force. Cut back drasticly on the military, and intelligence operations abroad. We should still provide the same benefits that can occur when you join the military to the greater public through military colleges and schools or some career training initiative to sign men/women up for service when needed for a certain amount of time in exchange for knowledge and free college education.
Then there's the world at large. We need internationalism, but a responsible, respectful form. One where such evil corruption as the U.N isn't happening, where nations unite to solve problems, while respecting their differences and 'moving forward together.'
Then there's the world itself. Studies show that the environment goes in cycles and we can change the speed of the cycles, although the speed in which we change them could possibly be extremely small. We need to focus on a larger problem which could kill us-the ozone layer. We need some serious research there, and try and find a way to regain our ozone to a very healthy level. All ozone particles are is just 2 atoms of oxygen, so how is it we can invent new elements, yet we can't make enough ozone to save ourselves?
Then there's the Republic system of governance. It's just messed up, and the constitution all the independants, libertarians, etc. point to even says in plain text that the senate/congress have dictatorial powers as much as the very dictator we replaced in the revolution. We need a democracy, where the people vote direcly on the issue. We are smart enough to vote, aren't we?
Then there's state's rights. Okay, I hope we all can agree that this issue is something that is necissary to focus on in order to change America for the better. We need state's rights now more than ever in our history. A man living in minnesota knows how to run minnesota better than a man in washington.
It seems as when legislators try to slip some new laws by us and disregard our outrage, it is as though they respect us as much as a trash can.
I recently finished reading confessions of an economic hitman, and it really made me think about the current western society. It showed how the massive corporations we may/may not have to bailout cause harm to many, while the media only covers *our* benefits. I began thinking, and I think that we need a relook on our values. We do need freedom in market and in the individual, but we also need social obligations, to those less fortunate than ourselves. We need to have much less taxes, and we also need the make sure that we guarantee jobs to Americans in need of them, while also making sure those jobs don't destroy other countries. I personally believe that we should relook at the corporations that take part in building and other actions overseas, and possibly relook the debt owed to us. Maybe if we void-ed all debt to America, then the countries profits could be made higher and if by the light of their morals, they gave us money to help us, could infact possibly make more money than acting on a irs to homeless person basis. We could be the man who gives his home to the poor man, and when the poor man gets rich, he too takes the richer man to new heights. When we combine the two and get two types of obligations and responsibilites, we make a better society. Just look at Panama. If we gave up the canal freely, and helped them out in making their country prosper without all trauma we caused them, then we could have made much out of such a deal. We need not look at countries as places on a map, but rather as places with people who deserve lives not in poverty, but in happiness. We need to have individual responsibility as well, we don't need a 'nanny state' where it takes years to get treatment when your a cancer patient. It's proven in canada how people with extremely debilitating illnesses come to america to get private treatment, as they would usually die from the sheer amount of beaurocracy in the canadian national system. We need, instead, to lower taxes, use credits to our advantage, and to allow greater mobility toward 'illegals' and future immigrants to our country. We need a better tax system, and we just plainly put-need more individual, and social responsibility and obligations. When we focus not only on the poor, but ourselves, the poor, and the rich and we find solutions for all, where we all have freedom and power, that is how we succede.
Obama's plan is simply put: A "public[socialist]" option for people without insurance. It will cost us all dearly and will cripple our medical output for patients. We may end up as bad as canada[where cancer patients usually die because of government interference and socialism]. Just think about the government option for a second. Now think about corporate options. You see, government can raise taxes to make the insurance cheaper. Corporations can't, and when the "public option" takes over, we will lose our choice, and will be forced into an unsustainable beaurocracy! This is unthinkably stupid and uneconomical! I thought the president went to college. Now, there is an alternative. we can give people a certain tax credit and they would be able to buy PRIVATE health insurance. That means it's your doctor, no beaurocracy, and you are treated fairly. If we do obama's social option, then we will be forced into it, and since the corporate option would be dead, people will have to give that up, pay it off a bit, and then give their money to THE GOVERNMENT. THE G-O-V-E-R-N-M-E-N-T! Is it me, or is congress finally acting somewhat smart by rejecting this proposal, althought a sizeable majority might pass it, in which case-America is doomed.
We need to privitize not socialize.
We need inscentive and we can triumph as good honest hardworking Americans.
Look at social security, if you put in a set amount every paycheck [pre-deducted from your paycheck] into YOUR OWN account, then how can there be any debt to the government involved. In the CURRENT socialized system we put in money into one big pot, if you will. And then they redistribute it in set quantities to those that meet the requirements[something totally a-moral is the fact that military retirees have to pay into it when they don't get anything out of it... SUCH A DISGRACE!]. Eventually though, the baby boomers will retire and drive SOCIAL security into extinction as the government won't have ENOUGH money to pay them.
But it's just common sense if you think of PRIVATE security. What you pay into it is your own money, and you cant' take it out until your old enough. And the GOVERNMENT CANNEVER GET IN DEBT!
I have researched politics for years and I would like to factor in the human nature and what it means to politics and economics.
I'd really like to know all your political ideas and stances on ANYTHING you feel strongly about.
I will post my personal views and we can expect debate.
Please don't bash one another because of their belief or preconceptions, rather debate with a clear conscious and an open mind-lest we end up like the Third Reich or some other socio-economic system where those who dissent are dead [IRAN].
When someone calls something the opiate of the masses, he is basically labelling something that is considered something that keeps 'us [humans]' in line with those who seem to be above us, no matter what system we use. Humans nowadays seem to think freedom is a 'god given right.' Is it really? Advancement is the opiate of the masses, becuase it implies we are above something, nature, and that means that we will be happy with that, as we naturally want to be the best. Something else that is the opiate of the masses, politics. Being a 'liberal' is the instant way to be 'cool' and to be 'popular' becuase the majority of people follow that idea. The 'conservatives' are currently the prey in this hunt. It used to be vice versa, and it is much like a fight between a whale and a shark. You will never know who wins. The idea we are free to have our own opinion, ie political freedom, that is a major opiate of the masses. Another opiate of the masses is science. We humanity know only a speck of what we think we know, and the more we feel happy in what we know, the less we will learn, and the fatter we will get, not only on our bodies, but in our heads, thinking we are advanced when we are behind, technologically, by thousands of years and counting. Another big opiate of the masses is the notion that humanity can be equal to one another. We are all bound to our DNA, no? If we weren't then we would have all types of 'mutants.' We are bound to the DNA and the instincts that came with it. Let's look at ants. Yes ants. When one is seperated from the collective it must return or die. For example, the Third Reich. They seperated from the collective [as did the soviets, which I will explain soon] and they also tried to eradicate opponents who happened to sponsor the collective thought at the time, and thus we fought. The japanese played both in a way, because the ant seemed to found a whole nest of ants that would later bite the US and nearly kill us. The soviet union, while communist, was going against the status quo in a radically extreme way. They had one absolute leader. The 'democracies' thought that their leaders were superior as they were elected. They thought themselves so advanced they decided to wage a war unanounced, ie a 'cold war' against what they thought as pure evil. It was basically a war of pure attrition between 'red ants' and 'black ants.' We know who won. But now the problem is, since we have one ideology in play nowadays, with a few breakaway ants who seem to want to form new colonies to challenge the 'blacks,' then we might falter as the 'blacks' seem to want more ant power, and to make the 'queen' equal to a 'worker.' The reason ants have conquered the earth is because they have a set system that works. Humans aren't ants, of course, but we are close.
I will explain more, much more later, but this is just a 'first chapter' of the primer into my beliefs. Critisize me, hate me, and in that you are exploiting the 'opiate of the masses,' hate. Love me and you are also using an opiate, love. Debate with me, and have fun reading it.
<< Home